1.
Kumaravadivelu, B. Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching : Macro-strategies for Language Teaching [Internet]. Yale University Press; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3420077
2.
Pica T. Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology. System. 2000 Mar;28(1):1–18.
3.
Richards JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 3rd ed. Vol. Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
4.
Larsen-Freeman D, Anderson M. Techniques and principles in language teaching. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
5.
Spiro J, MyiLibrary. Changing methodologies in TESOL [Internet]. Vol. Edinburgh textbooks in TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1404628
6.
Shaw PA. The Syllabus is Dead, Long Live the Syllabus: Thoughts on the State of Language Curriculum, Content, Language, Tasks, Projects, Materials, Wikis, Blogs and the World Wide Web. Language and Linguistics Compass [Internet]. 2009 Sep;3(5):1266–83. Available from: https://doi-org.unm-ezproxy.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00154.x
7.
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):3–9.
8.
Richards JC. Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal. 2013 Apr 1;44(1):5–33.
9.
Savignon SJ. Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics. 2007 Jan;39(1):207–20.
10.
Feryok A. An Armenian English language teacher’s practical theory of communicative language teaching. System. 2008 Jun;36(2):227–40.
11.
Woods D, Çakır H. Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System. 2011 Sep;39(3):381–90.
12.
Mikulec E, Miller PC. Using Project-Based Instruction to Meet Foreign Language Standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas [Internet]. 2011 Mar 17;84(3):81–6. Available from: https://doi-org.unm-ezproxy.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00098655.2010.516779
13.
Ellis R. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2009 Oct 20;19(3):221–46.
14.
Batstone R. Language form, task-based language teaching, and the classroom context. ELT Journal. 2012 Oct 1;66(4):459–67.
15.
Robinson P. Task-Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. Language Learning. 2011 Jun;61:1–36.
16.
Choo, J.P.L, Too, W.K. Teachers’ Perceptions in Using Task-Based Instruction for the Teaching of Grammar. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE) [Internet]. 2012;2(1). Available from: https://university2.taylors.edu.my/jire/downloads/vol2_04.pdf
17.
Kumaravadivelu B. TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends. TESOL Quarterly. 2006 Mar 1;40(1).
18.
Bell DM. Do teachers think that methods are dead? ELT Journal. 2007 Apr 1;61(2):135–43.
19.
Baecher L, Farnsworth T, Ediger A. The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research. 2014 Jan 1;18(1):118–36.
20.
Cenoz J, Genesee F, Gorter D. Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied Linguistics. 2014 Jul 1;35(3):243–62.
21.
Echevarria J, Richards-Tutor C, Canges R, Francis D. Using the SIOP Model to Promote the Acquisition of Language and Science Concepts with English Learners. Bilingual Research Journal. 2011 Oct;34(3):334–51.
