1.
Kumaravadivelu, B. Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching : Macro-Strategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press; 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3420077
2.
Pica T. Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology. System. 2000;28(1):1-18. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00057-3
3.
Richards JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
4.
Larsen-Freeman D, Anderson M. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
5.
Spiro J, MyiLibrary. Changing Methodologies in TESOL. Vol Edinburgh textbooks in TESOL. Edinburgh University Press; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1404628
6.
Shaw PA. The Syllabus is Dead, Long Live the Syllabus: Thoughts on the State of Language Curriculum, Content, Language, Tasks, Projects, Materials, Wikis, Blogs and the World Wide Web. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2009;3(5):1266-1283. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00154.x
7.
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal. 2004;58(1):3-9. doi:10.1093/elt/58.1.3
8.
Richards JC. Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal. 2013;44(1):5-33. doi:10.1177/0033688212473293
9.
Savignon SJ. Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics. 2007;39(1):207-220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.004
10.
Feryok A. An Armenian English language teacher’s practical theory of communicative language teaching. System. 2008;36(2):227-240. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.09.004
11.
Woods D, Çakır H. Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System. 2011;39(3):381-390. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.07.010
12.
Mikulec E, Miller PC. Using Project-Based Instruction to Meet Foreign Language Standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 2011;84(3):81-86. doi:10.1080/00098655.2010.516779
13.
Ellis R. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2009;19(3):221-246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
14.
Batstone R. Language form, task-based language teaching, and the classroom context. ELT Journal. 2012;66(4):459-467. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs058
15.
Robinson P. Task-Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. Language Learning. 2011;61:1-36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x
16.
Choo, J.P.L, Too, W.K. Teachers’ Perceptions in Using Task-Based Instruction for the Teaching of Grammar. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE). 2012;2(1). https://university2.taylors.edu.my/jire/downloads/vol2_04.pdf
17.
Kumaravadivelu B. TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends. TESOL Quarterly. 2006;40(1). doi:10.2307/40264511
18.
Bell DM. Do teachers think that methods are dead? ELT Journal. 2007;61(2):135-143. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm006
19.
Baecher L, Farnsworth T, Ediger A. The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research. 2014;18(1):118-136. doi:10.1177/1362168813505381
20.
Cenoz J, Genesee F, Gorter D. Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied Linguistics. 2014;35(3):243-262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011
21.
Echevarria J, Richards-Tutor C, Canges R, Francis D. Using the SIOP Model to Promote the Acquisition of Language and Science Concepts with English Learners. Bilingual Research Journal. 2011;34(3):334-351. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.623600
